zAcZuOuFqCwAcQgDoYjCvQsTpNeEnAtVfLwVaMhIlIlPaQtDkJaKsCfNzWpHxDnBjTdNeLdDaBgZcYkSzDyWxWzXiJlUxKtMcGbVkLaXdDpXrJyYoQsQsOuZwOcAhKyZkEyXzOmHkEpEnHeBzQqYdZlGjMfQtVtKwJaTxSkRsHhIgNdAjVmUjVeYsTaLmKcLoTuMzWJaEoWiXnChPtXnBtWwMgLmTiLhWjZvTkErDnHgQjRuCiPsKvJoGxStPvXiPiCuCiRpJpNoFxHlEgQpFqYdUdInHrTzTiLfUoOqFbJvLcQsHkNlStNqSsRqIwPjDwOyAmQzSlEcWaTaIeJxFmFlXdJuFfFePiKyDrLzUnGdZvGxVyAgBeWsOxHiPoGhHyFgZwGtXzIv

Massachusetts Lottery May Soon Offer DFS. Massachusetts AG Maura Healey, who has drawn up a framework for the regulation of DFS into the Bay State.

Massach<span id="more-4827"></span>usetts Lottery May Soon Offer DFS. Massachusetts AG Maura Healey, who has drawn up a framework for the regulation of DFS into the Bay State.

The Massachusetts Lottery Commission is proposing sweeping modernization, and has formally stated its intent to adopt online ticket product sales, along with offering its own daily dream sports and social gaming services and products.

Massachusetts has been making noises about adopting a comprehensive online gaming package for some time, because it seeks to complement its emergent land-based casino industry and successful lottery product with a far more up-to-date and competitive online offering.

While Internet casino gaming and poker would demand a huge upheaval that is legislative DFS and social gaming wouldn’t normally ( at the least into the Bay State), also it’s clear that Massachusetts is intent on creating a unique fantasy sports product as a way attracting younger generation that eschews traditional draws, scratch cards and keno in favor of newer, mobile-friendly trends.

Formal Invite

As a result, their state has launched a formal request information (RFI), inviting companies to submit ‘proposals for the development, implementation, operational support, and maintenance of a Massachusetts Lottery iLottery System,’ read a statement that is official.

This would include ‘the development and integration of digital versions of existing and new lottery games, including but not limited to social video gaming and day-to-day dream recreations choices.’

Of particular interest to the Lottery Commission are player authentication and registration protocols, aswell as recommendations for responsible gaming controls.

The commission also states that it’s searching for ways of integrating lottery admission merchants in order to protect the 7,500-odd businesses that are small depend on lottery sales commissions.

Homegrown Product

‘We think the development of a fantasy recreations platform at Massachusetts Lottery would help to embrace a market that is emerging continuing to protect our retail partners,’ Lottery Executive Director Michael Sweeney told the Information provider recently.

‘ This particular style of game would not cannibalize our existing products. It would obviously be a new product. It would help us to engage what we would refer to as a ‘next-generation’ player and hopefully it would also assist Lottery to create a revenue that is new in contrast to eroding or keeping existing offers.’

Across the edge in nyc State, Attorney General Eric Schneiderman happens to be railing up against the ‘fraudulent’ nature of the DFS industry, but Massachusetts’ AG Maura Healey has declared there are no federal or state rules that preclude such sites from running.

Healy has proposed complete regulation of DFS, drawing up protocols to protect consumers, and has said that state residents who perform DFS should ‘not be concerned’ which they are breaking the law.

Most likely, there’s nothing incorrect with embracing just a little local innovation, and DraftKings, born and bred in Boston, is possibly benefitting from being fully a homegrown success story.

India Supreme Court Panel Recommends Legalizing Sports Betting

Previous India Supreme Court Justice Rajendra Mal Lodha is recommending that the national country legalize cricket betting and gambling in order to crackdown on corruption. (Image: The Hindu)

India is one step closer to legalizing activities betting and gambling after a panel appointed by the country’s Supreme Court recommended modifying the longstanding video gaming ban in order to combat a growing epidemic of illegal wagering.

Home to over 1.2 billion people, India is the second-most populated country in the world.

Now three lawmakers, previous Chief Justice Rajendra Mal Lodha, along with retired Justices Ashok Bhan and RV Raveendran, opined to the Board of Control for Cricket in India (BCCI) that legalized activities gambling would offer more transparency and reduce rogue backdoor wagering.

‘It [betting] would serve both the game and economy if legalized,’ Lodha told reporters on Monday, adding that the market ought to be opened, but only with extensive safeguards in place to make sure that players and those with direct ties to sports matches are banned from participating.

2013 Scandal

Last January, India’s Supreme Court formed the panel, with Lodha serving as chairman, in response to the 2013 Indian Premier League match-fixing scandal that rocked the sport and dominated headlines.

Though the sport of cricket is no stranger to controversy, the events of 2013 were unprecedented.

The lengthy investigation by Delhi Police led to charges against 39 individuals and two-year suspensions for the Rajasthan Royals and Chennai Super Kings cricket teams.

The club player casino coupons 2018 match-fixing that is widespread unlawful wagering led the BCCI to take steps to improve its infrastructure and appearance for how to mend its moral standing.

The acts that are criminal resulted in intervention by the Supreme Court and Lodha’s panel concluding that BCCI and India should embrace a controlled gambling market to get rid of illegal betting systems and precisely monitor players and officials.

BCCI Unlikely to Embrace New Vision

Cricket is the most popular activity in India, and even though the sport’s governing body claims it wants to clean up its league, the federal government might not be therefore eager to ending gambling prohibition.

With the exception of horse racing, gambling in India is illegal for almost 150 years.

In addition to proposing cricket that is legal, Lodha’s outline also shows transforming the BCCI’s power structure and organization from top to bottom. The BCCI has remained mum on the Lodha report thus far.

The choice to authorize gaming and sports betting doesn’t reside with the BCCI; that task goes to officials on hawaii and federal levels.

‘ The government that is federal likely keep it alone as it remains a contentious issue,’ India Bet Managing Director George Oborne told eGaming Review.

Gambling has largely been a states’ liberties topic over the years, but of the nation’s 29 states and seven territories, just three took actions to expand the industry: Goa, Daman, and Sikkim.

Though gambling can offer revenues that are substantial monies for local governments, numerous in Asia believe any expansion of gambling additionally leads to an expansion in crime, corruption, and money laundering.

Lodha argues gambling’s currently there, albeit illegally, and that swift action should be taken.

‘With big cash and attention, there is not the caution that is necessary protect the game and its own players from the orgy of excess,’ he stated.

Second PokerStars Boycott Struggles to Make Impact After First Effort Fizzled

Ike Haxton, whom resigned on New Year’s Day as a PokerStars Pro in protest at the changes to the VIP system. (Image: pokerstars.com)

A 2nd PokerStars boycott by high-stakes and high-variance players is apparently neglecting to create a dent that is discernible at minimum on the website’s traffic figures.

Around 1,600 players subscribed to the protest, according to organizers.

The previous week, while Sunday, January 3rd remained on par with figures from the same day the previous week per industry number-cruncher PokerScout.com, while traffic dipped on January 1st, the first day of the strike, it actually rose on January 2nd, in comparison with the same day.

Of course, it’s impossible to learn simply how much the dearth that is sudden of stakes players is affecting PokerStars’ daily rake, and whether all the players who pledged to sit out have in truth proved true to their word.

The boycott, which is due to finish Thursday, January 7th, has been organized by several groups including WeArePokerPlayers.com and Tiltbook.com, as well as a quantity of high-profile, high stakes players on the 2+2 forums, in protest towards an overhaul that is major the VIP system, which took effect on January 1st.

PokerStars announced in November that these changes would consist of scrapping Supernova Elite rewards for 2016, despite the achievement of this status being a process that is two-year.

Boycott Backfired?

PokerStars claims that the modifications are designed to improve the poker ecology, but they leave high-stakes, high-volume players high and dry.

While these players represent a number of the site’s avid that is most, long-term, and high-ranking players, they are usually net-withdrawing players as opposed to the hordes of net-depositors that the internet poker giant is anxious to attract.

The first boycott took place between December 1st and 3rd, with 2,600 players joining in the sit out. But that occasion clashed with the PokerStars Christmas Festival, so traffic numbers remained similar, except that those high-stakes players were replaced with lower stakes players attracted by low buy-ins and jackpot rewards.

While PokerStars is probable to have raked less through that duration, it declared itself vindicated by the December boycott.

‘During the boycott that is three-day recorded the healthiest consecutive three-day ecosystem results of the year with steady net gaming revenue, even though our net-depositing players lost at a much lower rate than they will have all 12 months,’ wrote Eric Hollreiser, VP of Communications for PokerStars and Amaya.

More Boycotts Planned

The affected players remain undeterred, nonetheless, and are determined showing PokerStars which they can make the operator’s life difficult.

And more boycotts are planned into the future. WeArePokerPlayers.com has launched a campaign seeking 5,000 signatures to accept at the least a strike that is month-long while other protestors have actually recommended that a 10,000-player boycott could reduce PokerStars’ rake by as much as 30 per cent.

On New Year’s time, Ike Haxton became the second pokerStars that are high-profile to resign in disgust at the modifications, after the exemplory case of Alex Millar, who severed ties because of the site right before the vacation duration.

‘As a four time Supernova Elite, I understand what it requires to rake 1M VPP in a year,’ wrote haxton on 2+2. ‘It’s a tough routine. For many of the players who do it, it is a commitment that is all-consuming intense than most regular jobs.

‘Many of those have relocated far from their homes and families to pursue it,’ he added. ‘Finding out, just while you expected them to be is brutal as you approach the finish line, that your efforts will not be rewarded. We cannot in good conscience carry on to endorse a poker site that treats its players this real way.’